The decision to accept submitted research for publication depends on the recommendation of the editorial board and the reviewers; where research is blindly and confidentially reviewed. The reviewers base their decisions on the extent to which the research is related to the field of knowledge, the scientific and practical value of its results, the originality of the research ideas and its topic, the accuracy and modernity of the literature related to the subject of the research and its comprehensiveness, in addition to the integrity of the scientific method used in the study, the appropriateness of the data and the integrity of its analysis method, as well as The accuracy, comprehensiveness and interpretation of the final results of the research hypotheses, the soundness of organizing the presentation method in terms of the formulation of ideas and the language of the research, the quality and clarity of tables and figures, the accuracy of the conclusions, recommendations and other criteria that guarantee the publication of solid scientific research in the fields of knowledge concerned by the journal.

Decisions and criteria for acceptance of publication:

1)- The editorial board is the body responsible for approving the publication of scientific research submitted to the journal. Papers submitted to the journal are evaluated to ensure that they meet all criteria of the terms and conditions published in the journal.

2)- What is considered is the scientific value and ethical standards of the work, the integrity of the scientific research, the linguistic style, and scientific accuracy.

3)- The editorial committee is committed to improving the scientific sobriety of the journal by publishing research according to its importance, clarity, originality, and compliance with the terms and conditions announced to researchers.

4)- The editorial committee of the journal is also obligated not to disclose the names of the referees, as well as not to disclose the names of the researchers who have research submitted for publication before the referees to achieve the principle of transparency.